We were unable to load Disqus. If you are a moderator please see our troubleshooting guide.
Recommending means this is a discussion worth sharing. It gets shared to your followers' Disqus feeds, and gives the creator kudos!
It sounds like the review is saying, "It's so bad that it's good."
I'd be tempted to see it for the performance of David Tennant, who, in "Jessica Jones," was the most compelling (pun intended) villain ever to appear in a superhero franchise. However, I tend not to enjoy films where the protagonist is a dim bulb who does idiotic things.
Dean Devlin?!?!?!? Don't some people know when to quit, or when to just somehow stop getting money? Do studios not realize that Devlin was responsible for "Geostorm" not that long ago, a movie one didn't even need to sit through to realize that it would be one of the most worthless and uncalled-for movies ever made?!? The only thing worse than Devlin still getting employment is Roland Emmerich still getting employment. Is the guy responsible for "Pluto Nash" still working?
I don't think this reviewer actually watched the entire film, either that or he took a bathroom break when the motive was explained. I enjoyed this film very much.I'll watch anything with David Tennant. But, yes, the jump scare music at the beginning WAS annoying.
This review has too many grammatical and spelling errors to be taken seriously.
I ran it through a spell-checker; only a few foreign names were redlined: there are no spelling errors. I doubt if there are any grammar errors, but I'm not going to bother parsing it.
Perhaps your problem is that it wasn't written in Dutch.
Horror is the only genre that gets a good rating even if the movie is schlock. And look for this schlock to clean up at the box office.
Wtf??? Horror regularly gets awful reviews, cuz mostly of it's tripe.